Google’s John Mueller defined what he would take into account being a search high quality subject, inflicting rating points particular to Google contemplating the location not “high quality.” John mentioned on Twitter “to me, high quality points are issues that customers would take into account to be problematic.”
He added that technical points that customers don’t see doubtless wouldn’t be thought of a high quality subject by Google. John mentioned, “unhealthy rel-canonical resulting in an alternate URL being listed one thing customers would discover? Most likely not.”
John additionally mentioned it’s common to see each high quality and technical points on the identical web site however that doesn’t imply the 2 are the identical. John wrote, “each technical points & high quality points are extraordinarily broad fields, there’s all the time some overlap (eg, is velocity a high quality or a technical subject?).” “If a web site has obtrusive points in one of many two, then tweaking the opposite aspect will not make a giant impression,” he added.
Listed below are the tweets associated to this, so you possibly can see it in context:
.@johnmu are search engine marketing technical points high quality points? I’ve seen articles that say you mentioned they had been and that you just mentioned they weren’t lol
Simply making an attempt to get clarification.
— Kristine Schachinger (@schachin) September 21, 2022
Each technical points & high quality points are extraordinarily broad fields, there’s all the time some overlap (eg, is velocity a high quality or a technical subject?). If a web site has obtrusive points in one of many two, then tweaking the opposite aspect will not make a giant impression.
— 🌽〈hyperlink href=//johnmu.com rel=canonical 〉🌽 (@JohnMu) September 21, 2022
It is dependent upon what you take into account a high quality subject. To me, high quality points are issues that customers would take into account to be problematic. Is a nasty rel-canonical resulting in an alternate URL being listed one thing customers would discover? Most likely not.
— 🌽〈hyperlink href=//johnmu.com rel=canonical 〉🌽 (@JohnMu) September 21, 2022
And considerably associated however in a unique thread, John wrote “Simply because an internet site is technically legitimate doesn’t suggest it is a helpful & related search end result for customers.”
Simply because an internet site is technically legitimate doesn’t suggest it is a helpful & related search end result for customers.
— 🌽〈hyperlink href=//johnmu.com rel=canonical 〉🌽 (@JohnMu) September 21, 2022
So technical points and high quality points are completely different, in response to John Mueller of Google.
Discussion board dialogue at Twitter.
